Quisenberry v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “can I tell my lawyer the real story and he tell y'all?” not invocation of right to counsel
• “[I]nvited errors that amount to a waiver, i.e., invitations that reflect the party's knowing relinquishment of a right, are not subject to appellate review.”
• “[The defendant’s] express representation to the trial court that the evidence of facilitation was sufficient, waived his right to claim on appeal that it was not.”
• “[W]e reiterate that when a properly redacted statement of a codefendant is to be presented to the jury, a limiting instruction should always be given upon the defendant’s request.”
• “Generally, a party is estopped from asserting an invited error on appeal.”
• “[T]he accused need not have … actually participated in any other act of force or violence; it is sufficient that he came and went with the robbers, was present when the robbery was com- mitted, and acquiesced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).