Skip to main content

State v. Reynolds

Citations

  • 983 A.2d 874
  • 118 Conn. App. 278
  • 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 515
  • 2009 WL 4348656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prosecutor’s ques- tions improperly violated trial court order because pros- ecutor’s representations to court revealed that she intended to elicit evidence court had expressly disal- lowed
  • discussing a distinction “in medical terminology, between objective findings, which are based on the observations of a medical provider, and subjective findings, which are based on the information provided to a medical provider by a patient”
  • purposeful attempt by prosecutor to include inadmissible evidence ‘‘may entitle the defen- dant to a new trial’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Gruendel, Harper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.