Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/15/2009
State v. Hampton
Citations
- 988 A.2d 167
- 293 Conn. 435
- 2009 Conn. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that claim on appeal regarding motion to suppress was not preserved because claim was not distinctly raised in motion to suppress or during suppression hearing
- following Marone and concluding that Salamon is applicable to pending appeal in case tried nearly two years prior to its release
- permitting defendant to file supplemental brief raising new claim in light of new constitutional rule announced in Salamon, which was released after defendant filed initial brief on appeal
- defense counsel was clearly aware of defect subsequently raised on appeal when trial court twice raised with counsel question whether unanimity instruction was required
- case law and rules of practice generally limit review to issues distinctly raised at trial
- “judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively ... to cases that are pending” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz, Norcott, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 52×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 49×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-02-18· cited 38×
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-19· cited 37×
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies CollectiveConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-11· cited 31×
- State v. Roger B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-27· cited 30×
- State v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-08· cited 22×
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-01· cited 21×
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-05-24· cited 21×
- State v. Lamont FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-30· cited 19×
- State v. THOMAS W.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-02· cited 18×
- State v. NATHAN J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-01· cited 17×
- State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-02· cited 15×
- State v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-22· cited 15×
- State v. ArmadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-03-23· cited 15×
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-31· cited 14×
- Banks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-05-12· cited 13×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-06-19· cited 12×
- State v. CancelConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-04-01· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.