Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/1/2009
State v. Foster
Citations
- 977 A.2d 199
- 293 Conn. 327
- 2009 Conn. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Crawford not violated because trial court admitted statements for purpose other than for truth of matter asserted, and, therefore, statements were not inadmissible either on hearsay grounds or pursuant to rule in Crawford
- defendant waived objection to supplemental instruction in part because it “essentially repeated” portion of initial instruction defendant had approved
- ‘‘For certain fundamental rights, the defendant must personally make an informed waiver. . . . For other rights, however, waiver may be effected by action of counsel [such as consenting to or expressing satisfaction with the ruling at issue].’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
- State v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-08· cited 22×
- State v. AkandeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 19×
- State v. ArmadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-03-23· cited 15×
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-09· cited 15×
- State v. CastilloConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-15· cited 12×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-15· cited 10×
- State v. HankersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-15· cited 8×
- State v. ReevesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-05· cited 6×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-06-24· cited 6×
- State v. MyersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-21· cited 4×
- Manka v. Walt Disney Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-03-25· cited 3×
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-09-29· cited 1×
- Murphy v. RosenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-01-21· cited 1×
- State v. WilloughbyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-11-04
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-12-23
- State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-07-07
- State v. CarrasquilloConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-08-06
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-24· cited 160×
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 151×
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 122×
- Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 108×
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 91×
- Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-14· cited 90×
- State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-26· cited 64×
- State v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-22· cited 62×
- Barron-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-11-28· cited 62×
- State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 59×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-29· cited 55×
- State v. RespassSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-15· cited 52×
- Galle v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court· 2001-10-29· cited 48×
- State v. HolnessSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-18· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.