State v. Reimer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the offenses occurred at the same time and place, “[a]ppellant’s decision to drive with an expired license may be attributed to errors in judgment wholly independent of his decision to drink and drive.”
• stating that “Minnesota courts have reached similar results in a variety of factual situations involving one or more motor vehicle violations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Marchbanks
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-08-07· cited 21×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-03-25· cited 146×
• State v. Bookwalter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
• State v. Reiland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-05-06· cited 48×
• State v. Butcher
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-05-27· cited 45×
• State v. Zuehlke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-06-04· cited 30×
• State v. Wheat
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-04-13· cited 7×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-04-09· cited 5×
• State v. Holland
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-29· cited 5×
• State v. Meland
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-08-29· cited 5×