State v. Reiland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that offense of driving after revocation of driver’s license did not arise out of the same behavioral incident as the negligent driving offense because the conduct constituting each offense did not result from a single common criminal objective
• holding that offense of driving after revocation of driver's license did not arise out of the same behavioral incident as the negligent driving offense because the conduct constituting each offense did not result from a single common criminal objective
• “As is true of . . . traffic offenses, intent is not an essential element of the crime.”
• each analysis under section 609.035 is fact specific and must be individually analyzed
• “Although the offense of negligent homicide is classified as a serious crime, in essence it is a traffic offense designed to promote the safety of persons properly upon the highway. As is true of other traffic offenses, intent is not an essential element of the crime.”
• driving after revocation of license and criminal negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).