State v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that sentencing for convictions of driving after cancellation and DWI did not violate section 609.035
• observing that “the entire record” includes “the [r]ule 15 petition and the transcript 9 of the plea hearing”
• stating that the factual basis for a guilty plea “may be ascertained from the record, which may include defendant’s testimony from the guilty plea hearing or other proceedings before the trial court, testimony of other witnesses, or statements summarizing the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Reimer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-04-24· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-03-25· cited 146×
• State v. Trott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 145×
• State v. Bookwalter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
• State v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-01· cited 27×
• City of Moorhead v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 13×
• State v. Milton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 6×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-04-23· cited 5×
• State v. Wurst
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-03· cited 2×