Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/8/2003

State v. Reeves

Citations

670 N.W.2d 199
2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 185
2003 WL 22300125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that when the evidence is such that reasonable minds could differ, the district court should not disturb the jury’s findings
declaring that the rule gives a trial judge great discretion to determine whether, under the particular facts of the defendant's case, \the verdict effectuates substantial justice between the parties\
noting our court’s review of the district court’s ruling as to whether the verdict was contrary to weight of the evidence is for abuse of discretion
discussing “when and why trial courts must use a sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard or a weight-of-the-evidence standard”
noting our court’s review of the district court’s ruling as to whether the verdict was contrary to weight of the evidence is for abuse of discretion
noting “[a] motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence, concedes that there is sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavorato, Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

196 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Reeves

119 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.