Skip to main content

State v. Root

Citations

  • 801 N.W.2d 29
  • 2011 Iowa App. LEXIS 462
  • 2011 WL 2556970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the brief ruling ambiguous on whether the correct standard was applied and remanding for application of the weight-of-the-evidence standard
  • remanding case for application of the weight-of-the-evidence standard because the district court 19 did not articulate what standard it applied and the record was ambiguous as to the standard applied
  • remanding for application of weight-of-the-evidence standard when judge found verdict supported by “competent” evidence
  • noting appellate courts “have repeatedly remanded to make certain the proper standard was applied”
  • finding defendant waived issues because of failure to follow the rules of appellate procedure
  • “Root appeals and asserts the district court applied the wrong standard in ruling on his motion for a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huitink, Tabor, Takes, Vaitheswaran, Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.