State v. Inger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that evidence the victim assaulted the defendant could establish serious provocation
• recognizing that evidence the victim assaulted the defendant could establish serious provocation
• recognizing that evidence the victim assaulted the defendant could establish serious provocation
• concluding the State presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found the trauma inflicted by defendant was the proximate cause of the victim’s death
• finding no abuse of discretion in imposing sentence, noting sentencing court considered nature of defendant’s criminal actions, defendant’s lack of remorse, and fact that victim died
• finding “[t]he jury could have believed there was serious provocation from an assault” that occurred just before the killing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).