State v. Reeves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor decides which witnesses to call on behalf of the state and he may not be compelled to call a witness by the defendant
• confrontation clause does not give a defendant a right to compel a witness to testify for the state so that he may confront that witness
• Sixth Amendment rights of confrontation and compulsory process are fundamental in nature and obligatory on the states under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• defendant has no right to compel a witness to testify for the state so that he may confront him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Middleton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-04· cited 28×
• Landeverde v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-11· cited 19×
• State v. Montgomery
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-26· cited 8×
• State v. Gutierrez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-03· cited 3×
• Carino v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-31
• Piro v. State
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-03-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Agurs
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• Washington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
• United States v. Lovasco
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
• Cooper v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
• McCray v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
• United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×