Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 118 P.3d 791
  • 339 Or. 239
  • 2005 Ore. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that disbelieving a wit- ness’s testimony “does not add anything affirmative to the state’s evidence”
  • describing inquiry as whether the alleged victim had the “ability to make choices about having sexual relations with others”
  • describing inquiry as whether the alleged victim had the “ability to make choices about having sexual relations with others”
  • noting alleged victim’s recognition that “having sexual relations with defendant was wrong”
  • explaining that, for purposes of ORS 163.305(3
  • noting alleged victim’s recognition that “having sexual relations with defendant was wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Muniz, De Muniz, Kistler, Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.