Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/4/2015
State v. Reed
Citations
- 268 Or. App. 734
- 343 P.3d 680
- 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- application of an assess- ment tool to determine ability to consent to sexual conduct required “some subjective evaluation” of the assessed person’s responses to questions, but the expert’s subjective interpreta- tion was verified by interviews with others
- application of an assess- ment tool to determine ability to consent to sexual conduct required “some subjective evaluation” of the assessed person’s responses to questions, but the expert’s subjective interpreta- tion was verified by interviews with others
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Mooney, Sercombe, Tempore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
- State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 81×
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 44×
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-24· cited 41×
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-17· cited 38×
- State v. ReedOregon Supreme Court· 2005-09-01· cited 25×
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-12-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.