Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/24/2000
State v. Sampson
Citations
- 6 P.3d 543
- 167 Or. App. 489
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that some portions of the DRE protocol are “not clearly based on medical science”
- concluding that the Protocol is scientific, but holding it sufficiently reliable to be admissible
- determining that evidence at issue was “scientific evidence subject to the judicial gatekeeping function”
- concluding that evidence from a DRE is scientific evidence
- explaining the scientific principles underlying DRE evidence and noting that “it is clear that DRE draws its authority from scientific principles”
- describing the DRE protocol as “a 12-step procedure performed by a trained officer that purports to determine whether a subject is under the influence of a controlled substance”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-02-24· cited 250×
- State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-20· cited 243×
- Epp v. LaubyNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-02· cited 95×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-14· cited 71×
- State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 40×
- Burton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 32×
- State v. AlemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-06-30· cited 31×
- State v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-31· cited 23×
- State v. Sanchez-CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
- State v. Beltran-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-06· cited 20×
- State v. BayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 19×
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
- State v. KochCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-03· cited 15×
- State v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-09· cited 11×
- State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 10×
- Kennedy v. Eden Advanced Pest TechnologiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-01· cited 9×
- State v. BaucumCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-22· cited 9×
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-17· cited 9×
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08· cited 6×
- State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.