Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/17/1993
State v. Lyons
Citations
- 863 P.2d 1303
- 124 Or. App. 598
- 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that \[t]here is no dispute that the PCR method is generally accepted within the field.\
- finding the potential for DNA contamination presents an “open field” for cross examination at trial, but does not indicate the PCR method of DNA testing is inappropriate for forensic use
- finding the potential for DNA contamination presents an “open field” for cross examination at trial, but does not indicate the PCR method of DNA testing is inappropriate for forensic use
- PCR generally accepted by the scientific community, appropriate for forensic use
- PCR generally accepted by the scientific community, appropriate for forensic use
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 138×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-22· cited 85×
- State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 81×
- People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-15· cited 74×
- State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-12-02· cited 73×
- State v. MooreMontana Supreme Court· 1994-11-22· cited 71×
- People v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-07-21· cited 69×
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-03-11· cited 60×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 46×
- Redding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-11-06· cited 24×
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 19×
- State v. BoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 17×
- United States v. GainesS.D. Florida· 1997-10-03· cited 17×
- People v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court· 1994-10-19· cited 15×
- State v. BurnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-13· cited 10×
- State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-23· cited 8×
- State v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-29· cited 6×
- State v. BerkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-08-03· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 320×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
- State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court· 1989-08-29· cited 107×
- State v. WilleOregon Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 66×
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-08-05· cited 39×
- State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-12· cited 33×
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 31×
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-08-20· cited 22×
- State v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-15· cited 19×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-18· cited 13×
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-03· cited 10×
- Trimboli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-01· cited 9×
- State v. WilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-01-22· cited 7×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.