Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3574

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the appellant's successive motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial. The appellant failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he was unavoidably prevented from obtaining the materials upon which his most recent motion relied. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.