Skip to main content

State v. Redden

Citations

  • 487 S.E.2d 318
  • 199 W. Va. 660
  • 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s colloquy that only advised the defendant that judge alone decides guilt or innocence in a bench trial was sufficient for the defendant to knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to a jury trial under the totality of the circumstances
  • holding that even though W. Va. R. Crim. P. 23(a
  • holding that even though W.Va. R.Crim. P. 23(a
  • using plain error to address an invited error issue that involved a fundamental right secured by the state and federal constitutions
  • using plain error to address an invited error issue that involved a fundamental right secured by the state and federal constitutions
  • noting that in addition to a trial court advising a defendant about his right to testify, a “defendant should also be advised that [the defendant] has a right not to testify and that if [the defendant] does not testify then the jury can be instructed about that right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Starcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.