State v. Thues

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Proposition 200 convictions are felonies for sentencing enhancement purposes notwithstanding the inability of a court to impose a term of imprisonment
• refusing to apply invited error doctrine where record did not reflect which party proposed stipulation which was source of error
• “[i]mposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error” that is not waived by defendant’s failure to raise it
• “[i]mposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error” that is not waived by defendant’s failure to raise it
• “Imposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error.”
• “Imposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).