State v. Rarden
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 873
Syllabus
Where a trial court enters an order without jurisdiction, its order is void and a nullity, and puts the parties in the same position they would be in if it had not occurred. Following the trial court's void order, appellant's motion was pending before the trial court. However, when a trial court fails to rule on a pending motion, an appellate court considers the motion denied. Appellant's attempt to amend his motion to raise new claims fourteen years later was improper.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CaseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-29· cited 17×
- State v. LittonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-28· cited 12×
- State v. BartrumOhio Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 9×
- In re F.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-22· cited 7×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-05· cited 6×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-23· cited 5×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-03· cited 2×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.