Skip to main content

State v. Rarden

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 873

Syllabus

Where a trial court enters an order without jurisdiction, its order is void and a nullity, and puts the parties in the same position they would be in if it had not occurred. Following the trial court's void order, appellant's motion was pending before the trial court. However, when a trial court fails to rule on a pending motion, an appellate court considers the motion denied. Appellant's attempt to amend his motion to raise new claims fourteen years later was improper.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.