Skip to main content

State v. Bowman

Citations

  • 223 N.E.3d 506
  • 2023 Ohio 2818

Syllabus

Appellant appeals vandalism convictions. Appellant moved for a new trial based on claim of undisclosed restitution evidence. Trial court did not abuse discretion denying new trial. Undisclosed evidence did not demonstrate strong possibility of changed result. Appellant did not meet his burden to demonstrate the materiality of the evidence.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.