Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/14/2023
State v. Bowman
Citations
- 223 N.E.3d 506
- 2023 Ohio 2818
Syllabus
Appellant appeals vandalism convictions. Appellant moved for a new trial based on claim of undisclosed restitution evidence. Trial court did not abuse discretion denying new trial. Undisclosed evidence did not demonstrate strong possibility of changed result. Appellant did not meet his burden to demonstrate the materiality of the evidence.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. SeiberOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-05· cited 268×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-22· cited 192×
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-26· cited 99×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. VoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-15· cited 40×
- State v. BillingsleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-27· cited 28×
- State v. SpradlinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-21· cited 8×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.