Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/5/2018
State v. Rarden
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4487
Syllabus
Appellant's sentence was not void or contrary to law and appellant has previously challenged his sentence on numerous prior occasions. As a result, his arguments are barred by res judicata.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- State v. LoveOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-28· cited 23×
- State v. SneadOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 14×
- State v. EarleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19· cited 6×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-18· cited 6×
- State v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-23· cited 5×
- State v. ElderOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-19· cited 3×
- State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-05· cited 2×
- State v. SingletaryOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.