Skip to main content

State v. Rarden

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4487

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not void or contrary to law and appellant has previously challenged his sentence on numerous prior occasions. As a result, his arguments are barred by res judicata.

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.