Skip to main content

State v. Rarden

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2161

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by denying appellant's motions to correct his alleged \illegal\ sentence where appellant's sentence was neither void nor contrary to law and appellant's claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.