Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 7/20/1999
State v. Rader
Citations
- 597 N.W.2d 321
- 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 846
- 1999 WL 508421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that driver’s procedural and substantive due-process rights were not violated when he failed to produce any evidence that his breath test was manipulated and because he failed to show any intended, direct, and personal harm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Davies, Foley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-11· cited 141×
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-02· cited 88×
- State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-11· cited 27×
- Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-26· cited 25×
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-09-22· cited 16×
- Butler v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-05· cited 15×
- State v. SchmidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-07-28· cited 15×
- Przymus v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-08-04· cited 12×
- Weierke v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.