Skip to main content
· 5/26/1978

Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety

Citations

  • 268 N.W.2d 46
  • 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where evidence indicated party actually knew his license was revoked, non-receipt of mailed revocation notice did not require reinstatement
  • where evidence indicated party actually knew his license was revoked, non-receipt of mailed revocation notice did not require reinstatement
  • “The signing of the receipt . . . raised a presumption that petitioner received actual notice of the state’s intent to revoke his license.”
  • “The primary thrust of the implied consent law is remedial and intended to protect public safety on the highway.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogosheske, Todd, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.