Skip to main content

State v. Pye

Citations

  • 653 S.E.2d 450
  • 282 Ga. 796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unwarned responses to police questioning were properly excluded, where evidence supported trial court’s implicit finding that defendant was in custody during the interrogation
  • agreeing that certain statements were not admissible, even though state had not advocated that the statements were admissible
  • instructing that Seibert requires an examination of certain circumstances to determine whether the Miranda warnings given were effective
  • Although the defendant’s brief included a purported enumeration of error and was denominated “Response Brief and Cross-Appeal of Appellee,” because the defendant had not filed a notice of cross-appeal, the Court ruled that it could not consider the purported enumeration of error.
  • Although the defendant’s brief included a purported enumeration of error and was denominated “Response Brief and Cross-Appeal of Appellee,” because the defendant had not filed a notice of cross-appeal, the Court ruled that it could not consider the purported enumeration of error.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.