State v. Kendrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering merits of appellant’s contention that the statements he made to an investigator, albeit after the reading of the Miranda rights, were inadmissible under Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U. S. 600 (124 SC 2601, 159 LE2d 643) (2004), and State v. Pye, 282 Ga. 796 (653 SE2d 450) (2007)
• State did not contest that defendant was “in custody” for Miranda purposes once he was handcuffed and confined in the back seat of a police cruiser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Abbott
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-03-15· cited 23×
• Dailey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-01-31· cited 11×
• Chavez-Ortega v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-04-10· cited 3×
• Pressley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-13
• Adrian Pressley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-13

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• Missouri v. Seibert
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
• Franks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-07-14· cited 50×
• Jennings v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-11-05· cited 35×
• Wells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-27· cited 28×
• State v. Wintker
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-03· cited 27×
• Wiggins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-12· cited 25×
• State v. Pye
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-29· cited 23×
• Quedens v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-03-27· cited 21×
• Grayer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-06-25· cited 13×
• Timmreck v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 8×