Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/16/2014

State v. Ferraro

Citations

264 Or. App. 271
331 P.3d 1086
2014 WL 3511686
2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was error to deny the defendant’s request for a continuance to investigate possible impeach- ment evidence, where the delay was not attributable to him
holding that it was error to deny the defendant’s request for a continuance to investigate possible impeach- ment evidence, where the delay was not attributable to him
cautioning that in some instances, motion for continuance to investigate what witnesses will be necessary for defense will be sufficient
reversing and remanding where “we cannot say that the court’s refusal to allow the continuance did not deny defendant his right to present an adequate defense”
explaining, in connection with reversing a criminal conviction based on erroneous denial of a continuance, that the credibility of the complainant and of her mother was “an issue that was central to [the defen- dant’s] case and defense”
explaining, in connection with reversing a criminal conviction based on erroneous denial of a continuance, that the credibility of the complainant and of her mother was “an issue that was central to [the defen- dant’s] case and defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.