Skip to main content
· 11/19/2013

Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative

Citations

  • 233 Ariz. 422
  • 314 P.3d 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no prejudice when amendment did nothing to change the theory of the case and the issue had been raised and addressed by the parties
  • affirming Rule 15(b) automatically amends pleadings to conform to the evidence and to raise additional issues when such issues are tried by the parties’ express or implied consent
  • “We will not rewrite statutes to effectuate a meaning different than the one the legislature intended.”
  • discussing Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vásquez, Howard, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.