· 11/19/2013
Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative
Citations
- 233 Ariz. 422
- 314 P.3d 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice when amendment did nothing to change the theory of the case and the issue had been raised and addressed by the parties
- affirming Rule 15(b) automatically amends pleadings to conform to the evidence and to raise additional issues when such issues are tried by the parties’ express or implied consent
- “We will not rewrite statutes to effectuate a meaning different than the one the legislature intended.”
- discussing Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vásquez, Howard, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.