State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling “a motion for a JNOV in a criminal case is not recognized in this state.”
• ruling \a motion for a JNOV in a criminal case is not recognized in this state.\
• \Our courts have recognized the authority of a trial court to grant a verdict in arrest of judgment to prevent entry of judgment on the insufficiency of the indictment or some other fatal defect appearing on the face of the record.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Follin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 21×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 5×
• State v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 3×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-11· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Prince
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 46×
• State v. Cutter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-06-18· cited 33×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-11-10· cited 28×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 28×
• State v. Dasher
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-04· cited 21×
• State v. Simmons
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-06-06· cited 18×
• State v. Dawkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-01-07· cited 15×
• State v. Cooler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-02-08· cited 10×
• State v. Jeter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1896-06-18· cited 9×
• State v. Blakeney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-06-13· cited 7×
• State v. Scurry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-08· cited 5×
• State v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1882-07-15· cited 4×