Supreme Court of Missouri· 5/29/2012
State v. Vaughn
Citations
- 366 S.W.3d 513
- 2012 WL 1931225
- 2012 Mo. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking down similar provision of statute as unconstitutional based in part on chilling effect on political speech as well as everyday communications, rejecting broad expansion of Rowan’s recognized privacy interests beyond the home and specific areas such as medical facilities
- “emotional distress” are words with common understanding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-11-26· cited 87×
- Jeremy Rowles v. Curators of the Univ. of MOEighth Circuit· 2020-12-18· cited 51×
- State of Missouri v. Santonio L. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-08-18· cited 27×
- State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-06-25· cited 23×
- State v. WoodenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-08· cited 21×
- Hink v. HelfrichSupreme Court of Missouri· 2018-05-01· cited 17×
- State v. StarkeyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02· cited 14×
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-12-10· cited 13×
- State of Missouri v. Marcus MerrittSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-08-18· cited 12×
- State of Missouri v. Pierre ClaySupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-02-09· cited 11×
- Doughty v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-08· cited 10×
- State v. ShanklinSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-12-05· cited 9×
- Gerald Geier and Stop Now! v. Missouri Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-11-24· cited 7×
- State v. MeeksMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-08· cited 7×
- Hill v. Mo. Dep't of ConservationSupreme Court of Missouri· 2018-07-03· cited 6×
- City of Raymore v. O'MalleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-29· cited 4×
- Doe v. McCullochMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-12-12· cited 4×
- Faustino Lopez-Matias v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-12-08· cited 3×
- State v. MixonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-11-13· cited 3×
- State of Missouri v. Matthew Burl FryeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-01-29· cited 2×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,269×
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 1,109×
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court· 1991-12-10· cited 673×
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 632×
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 519×
- Beauharnais v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 480×
- Hess v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 314×
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 256×
- Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-02-13· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.