· 8/25/1987
State v. Byman
Citations
- 410 N.W.2d 921
- 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Baltimore County Board’s grant of a variance was “arbitrary and illegal” because the applicant had not introduced evidence to establish the uniqueness element
- stating that a variance must be based on uniqueness of difficulties with respect to the particular land
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forsberg, Parker, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.