Skip to main content
· 8/25/1987

State v. Byman

Citations

  • 410 N.W.2d 921
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Baltimore County Board’s grant of a variance was “arbitrary and illegal” because the applicant had not introduced evidence to establish the uniqueness element
  • stating that a variance must be based on uniqueness of difficulties with respect to the particular land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forsberg, Parker, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.