State v. Alexander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant’s allegation that he was unable to prepare an adequate defense is without merit where appellant’s counsel used language of complaint pertinent to charge of aiding and abetting on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ostrem
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-08-18· cited 100×
• State v. Lucas
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-08-16· cited 48×
• State v. DeVerney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 40×
• State v. DeFoe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-08· cited 30×
• State v. Hagen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-22· cited 25×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-04-17· cited 4×
• State v. Ostrem
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-09· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-10· cited 119×
• State v. Jensen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1954-10-19· cited 72×
• State v. Ladehoff
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1963-07-16· cited 26×
• State v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-07-28· cited 21×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-04-03· cited 17×
• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-06-05· cited 15×
• State v. Pratt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-08-04· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Webber v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-07-28· cited 10×
• Draper v. Denno
  S.D. New York· 1953-06-23· cited 4×
• Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-06-18· cited 2×
• State v. Scalzo
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-01-06· cited 1×