· 3/28/1983
State v. Pownal Tanning Co.
Citations
- 459 A.2d 989
- 142 Vt. 601
- 1983 Vt. LEXIS 441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]s a general rule before a person may be held in contempt for violating a court order, the order should inform him in definite terms as to the duties imposed upon him.”
- party cannot be held in contempt for violating court order unless order is “specific and definite so that it leaves no reasonable basis for doubt as to its meaning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Costello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.