Skip to main content
· 3/28/1983

State v. Pownal Tanning Co.

Citations

  • 459 A.2d 989
  • 142 Vt. 601
  • 1983 Vt. LEXIS 441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]s a general rule before a person may be held in contempt for violating a court order, the order should inform him in definite terms as to the duties imposed upon him.”
  • party cannot be held in contempt for violating court order unless order is “specific and definite so that it leaves no reasonable basis for doubt as to its meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Costello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.