State v. Gundlah Ex Rel. Smallheer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exception did not apply because “[a] repetition of the fact pattern presented seems highly unlikely and certainly does not rise to a reasonable expectation”
• declining to apply the exception where there was no reasonable expectation of repetition of the ease’s fact pattern
• exception to mootness does not apply because repetition of fact pattern is unlikely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).