United States v. Harry A. Schafer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a defendant who negotiated for the decree, and consented to its entry, but took no steps to modify the decree was in no position to object to it or to rely on the vagueness of its language as a defense
• defendant convicted of criminal contempt for violation of consent order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).