Skip to main content

Powers v. State

Citations

  • 731 N.W.2d 499
  • 2007 Minn. LEXIS 254
  • 2007 WL 1438583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Knaffla rule also applies to claims raised or known at the time of earlier postconviction petitions
  • holding that a postconviction petition may not raise issues that are “essentially the same” as those raised on direct appeal
  • noting that district court properly considered defendant’s rule 27.03 motion to correct his sentence as his third postconviction petition
  • declining to consider an argument that the postconviction petitioner did not raise before the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.