State v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in a different context, that “ORS 165.800 creates a crime that targets deception or fraud”
• defendant convicted under section 165.800 for creating what appeared to be templates for Oregon identification cards or driver’s licenses
• defendant convicted under section 165.800 for creating what appeared to be templates for Oregon identification cards or driver’s licenses
• statutes may punish substantial steps toward accomplishment of forbidden results
• “The harm that the statute targets is deception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mandujano-Real v. Mukasey
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-22· cited 37×
• Pena v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2015-02-10· cited 17×
• State v. Mullen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-28· cited 8×
• State v. Medina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 7×
• State v. Moyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 4×
• Mandujano-Real v. Mukasey
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Robertson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
• State v. Moyle
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-08-27· cited 152×
• State v. Plowman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-27· cited 123×
• State v. Spencer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 78×
• State v. Garcias
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-04-03· cited 56×
• State v. Snow
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-07-29· cited 35×
• City of Eugene v. Lincoln
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-24· cited 15×