Oregon Supreme Court· 7/29/2004
State v. Snow
Citations
- 94 P.3d 872
- 337 Or. 219
- 2004 Ore. LEXIS 485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding exigency exists when situation requires police to act swiftly to prevent destruction of evidence
- holding exigency exists when situation requires police to act swiftly to prevent destruction of evidence
- holding exigency exists when situation requires police to act swiftly to prevent destruction of evidence
- stating that whether facts establish probable cause is a question of law
- stating that the exigent circumstances exception “requires both probable cause and an exigency”
- explaining that an exigent circumstance includes ‘“a situation that requires police to act swiftly *** to forestall *** the destruction of evidence’” (quoting State v. Stevens, 311 Or 119, 126, 806 P2d 92 (1991))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Terry Lee CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2018-06-22· cited 59×
- State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 41×
- State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 40×
- State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 39×
- State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court· 2021-12-30· cited 35×
- State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 32×
- State v. GuggenmosOregon Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 28×
- State v. Fessenden / DickeOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 22×
- State v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 19×
- State v. Kurokawa-LasciakCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 14×
- State v. FerraraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-13· cited 10×
- State v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-22· cited 10×
- State v. RitzOregon Supreme Court· 2017-08-10· cited 9×
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-09· cited 8×
- State v. TovarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-03· cited 8×
- State v. J. C. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 6×
- State v. SholediceOregon Supreme Court· 2018-12-13· cited 3×
- State v. BurshiaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-28· cited 3×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-27· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 1985-11-05· cited 162×
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 131×
- State v. MatsenOregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 57×
- State v. GirardOregon Supreme Court· 1976-10-21· cited 40×
- State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1968-02-14· cited 11×
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.