Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/1/1983
In Re Hall
Citations
- 469 A.2d 756
- 143 Vt. 590
- 1983 Vt. LEXIS 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a “specific script, a set of magic words, or even certain types of inquiries are not required” by Boykin
- court faded to outline minimum and maximum penalties of charged offense, but subst mtially complied with Rule 11
- burden of proving that procedural shortcoming hampered or frustrated exercise of accused’s rights rests squarely on petitioner in PCR cases
- “It is enough that the court engages in an open dialogue with the defendant involving ... the Rule 11(c
- rule does not require that the court read verbatim the rights enumerated under subdivision (c)
- rule does not require that the court read verbatim the rights enumerated under subdivision (c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Hill, Peck, Underwood, Larrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 45×
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-08· cited 43×
- In Re MillerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-04-03· cited 42×
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-02-07· cited 35×
- In Re DunhamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-01· cited 34×
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-06-06· cited 23×
- State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-07-19· cited 21×
- In Re KivelaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-03-22· cited 20×
- In Re MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-06-26· cited 19×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-01· cited 19×
- In Re BentleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-18· cited 17×
- In Re ParksSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-09· cited 15×
- In Re QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-10-24· cited 15×
- In re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-02· cited 15×
- State v. GabertSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-30· cited 13×
- State v. PollardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-01-20· cited 13×
- State v. MarkuSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-03-30· cited 13×
- State v. PloofSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-09-16· cited 12×
- State v. JoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 9×
- State v. MutwaleSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-02· cited 6×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 1,059×
- United States v. Howard E. SaftSecond Circuit· 1977-07-05· cited 135×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-06-21· cited 125×
- The United States of America v. Emanuel LesterSecond Circuit· 1957-08-12· cited 97×
- McMahon v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1978-09-12· cited 67×
- State v. RouseNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 47×
- United States v. John Eric Thompson and Ralph Giacinti, United States of America v. John Edward WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 1982-06-10· cited 40×
- United States v. Harold HamiltonNinth Circuit· 1978-02-06· cited 33×
- United States v. Walter James GraySeventh Circuit· 1979-12-13· cited 29×
- In Re RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-04-03· cited 21×
- In Re FullerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-12-06· cited 21×
- People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-07-15· cited 18×
- United States v. John Rudolph CrookFifth Circuit· 1979-11-27· cited 15×
- Petition of BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-01· cited 7×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-11-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.