Skip to main content

In Re Hall

Citations

  • 469 A.2d 756
  • 143 Vt. 590
  • 1983 Vt. LEXIS 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “specific script, a set of magic words, or even certain types of inquiries are not required” by Boykin
  • court faded to outline minimum and maximum penalties of charged offense, but subst mtially complied with Rule 11
  • burden of proving that procedural shortcoming hampered or frustrated exercise of accused’s rights rests squarely on petitioner in PCR cases
  • “It is enough that the court engages in an open dialogue with the defendant involving ... the Rule 11(c
  • rule does not require that the court read verbatim the rights enumerated under subdivision (c)
  • rule does not require that the court read verbatim the rights enumerated under subdivision (c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Hill, Peck, Underwood, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.