In Re Kivela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner’s argument that he did not understand nature of charges where record of plea hearing revealed that state’s attorney presented detailed and unchallenged recitation of facts underlying charges
• finding no violation of Rule 11(f) where charges were read to defendant and defendant admitted to acts underlying each offense
• finding no violation of Rule 11(f) where charges were read to defendant and defendant admitted to acts underlying each offense
• no violation of Rule 11(f) where charges were read to defendant and defendant admitted to acts underlying each offense
• defendant filed motion for sentence reconsideration under 13 V.S.A. § 7042 alleging pleas were not knowing and voluntary
• defendant filed motion for sentence reconsideration under 13 V.S.A. § 7042 alleging pleas were not knowing and voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).