State v. Pizzo
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2790
Syllabus
Appellant appeals from two misdemeanor convictions, claiming that the trial court erred in failing to notify him of his jail-time credit at sentencing. Because appellant has completely served his jail sentence in one case, his appeal from that case is dismissed as moot. No jail term was imposed in the second case. Because no other error has been assigned in the second case, that judgment is affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1970-04-08· cited 308×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 1975-03-26· cited 261×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 174×
- State v. BerndtOhio Supreme Court· 1987-03-04· cited 171×
- City of Cleveland Heights v. LewisOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 110×
- Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 104×
- The State Ex Rel. Ford v. Ruehlman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court· 2016-06-21· cited 64×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-06· cited 39×
- State v. BoystelOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-23· cited 7×
- Pruitt v. PruittOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.