State v. Boystel
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2529
Syllabus
Appellant appeals from her conviction of a minor misdemeanor traffic offense. Because there were collateral consequences from her conviction, the appeal is not moot. The conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by strictly construing the traffic ordinance against appellant, and similarly, the trial court did not err by not accepting a plea that was never officially presented. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.