Skip to main content

Pruitt v. Pruitt

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2058

Syllabus

Husband's appeal of the property division in a divorce decree was not moot where Wife's evidence failed to demonstrate that he had satisfied that portion of the judgment. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to compensate Husband for Wife's claiming their minor son as a dependent for tax purposes during the pendency of the divorce or in allocating the debt on his credit cards solely to him, except for $1,500. The trial court abused its discretion in failing to address disputed property that Wife took from the marital home during the pendency of the case. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in designating Wife as residential and custodial parent of the minor child or in its determination of Husband's parenting time. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.