Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/20/1995
State v. Pierce
Citations
- 657 A.2d 192
- 163 Vt. 192
- 1995 Vt. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that requiring prosecutorial agreement in deferred sentencing does not violate separation of powers because deferred sentencing is more analogous to the prosecutor's power to plea bargain or a conditional pardon
- determining that requiring prosecutorial agreement in deferred sentencing does not violate separation of powers because deferred sentencing is more analogous to the prosecutor's power to plea bargain or a conditional pardon
- determining that requiring prosecutorial agreement in deferred sentencing does not violate separation of powers because deferred sentencing is more analogous to the prosecutor's power to plea bargain or a conditional pardon
- Vermont’s deferred adjudication statute does not violate separation of powers principles by conditioning entry of deferred sentence on prosecutorial consent
- trial court has final say whether to accept or reject agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brady v. DeanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-12-26· cited 32×
- In re D.L.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-22· cited 26×
- State v. RafuseSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-12-08· cited 15×
- In Re the Welfare of L.J.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-14· cited 15×
- State v. DanielOhio Supreme Court· 2023-11-09· cited 12×
- People in Interest of RWVColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-01-09· cited 11×
- State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-06· cited 9×
- In re Essex Search WarrantsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-11-09· cited 6×
- State v. Peter A. GoeweySupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-01-28· cited 4×
- In Re DLSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-22
- STATE VS. DIST. CT. (HEARN (MATTHEW))Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-06
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-11-26
- State v. PutvainSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-02-22
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,807×
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court· 1974-03-27· cited 180×
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 142×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-11· cited 141×
- United States v. Domingo RexachSecond Circuit· 1990-02-20· cited 126×
- State v. LagaresSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-02-06· cited 125×
- State v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 117×
- United States v. Robert HuertaSecond Circuit· 1989-06-28· cited 115×
- Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 113×
- State v. ZaccaroSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-09· cited 63×
- State v. LeCompteSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-11-16· cited 60×
- State v. SaariSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-15· cited 46×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-07-19· cited 36×
- State v. AngelucciSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-05-22· cited 26×
- Wolfe v. YudichakSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-05-15· cited 25×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 19×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-06-07· cited 17×
- Brugman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-02-13· cited 14×
- Doe v. SalmonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-09-12· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.