Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/19/1984
State v. Jones
Citations
- 689 P.2d 561
- 142 Ariz. 302
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking down statute conditioning court’s power to impose less than mandatory minimum sentence on recommendation of prosecu tor
- noting that time for prosecutor’s allegation was after con viction
- statute that makes alternative sentencing dependent upon prosecutor’s recommendation impermissibly encroaches on judicial function
- “If part of an act is unconstitutional, but by eliminating the unconstitutional portion the balance of the act is workable, only that part which is objectionable will be eliminated and the balance will be left intact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Birdsall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-26· cited 216×
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 142×
- State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court· 1989-11-09· cited 61×
- State v. AlvarezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
- State v. GonzalezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-02-25· cited 37×
- State v. A.T.C.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-04-19· cited 31×
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-06· cited 21×
- State v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-03· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-11· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-07-30· cited 18×
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-04-21· cited 17×
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-01-20· cited 17×
- State v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-29· cited 16×
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-05· cited 15×
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-12-30· cited 14×
- Bohn v. WaddellArizona Tax Court· 1990-04-06· cited 12×
- Andrews v. WillrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-16· cited 12×
- People in Interest of RWVColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-01-09· cited 11×
- State v. BoudetteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-09· cited 9×
- Hudson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 9×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People Ex Rel. Carey v. CousinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-11-21· cited 247×
- People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-09-01· cited 209×
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-23· cited 185×
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court· 1974-03-27· cited 180×
- People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-10-25· cited 128×
- Esteybar v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-06-22· cited 121×
- Van Sickle v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-06-09· cited 66×
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-12-06· cited 59×
- Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1978-10-31· cited 56×
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-09-03· cited 51×
- Giss v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1957-04-06· cited 46×
- State v. CourseyArizona Supreme Court· 1950-12-11· cited 41×
- State v. PakulaArizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-25· cited 40×
- People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-07-27· cited 34×
- Ahearn v. BaileyArizona Supreme Court· 1969-02-26· cited 30×
- Clifton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-05-05· cited 27×
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1925-04-18· cited 17×
- State v. McClarityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-22· cited 10×
- Harris v. MaehlingArizona Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.