Skip to main content

State v. Cochran

Citations

  • 365 S.W.3d 628
  • 2012 WL 1499893
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing testimony that went beyond the competence of the expert and invaded the province of the jury as unhelpful and irrelevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mitchell, Pfeiffer, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.