Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/12/1994
State v. Phillips
Citations
- 873 P.2d 706
- 178 Ariz. 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Arizona’s DUI laws were “designed to protect the public by reducing the terrible toll of life and limb on our roads”
- noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from ... drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
- noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from ... drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
- noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from . . . drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
- explaining that drugs’ potency cannot be accurately predicted
- explaining that drags’ potency cannot be accurately predicted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ehrlich, Grant, Voss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-04-21· cited 88×
- State of Iowa v. Jonathan Q. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2012-01-20· cited 84×
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 64×
- State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-06-30· cited 64×
- State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-12-11· cited 51×
- Love v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 46×
- State v. ComriedSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-03-18· cited 36×
- State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John MyersSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-03-08· cited 36×
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-01· cited 29×
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-17· cited 27×
- State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-09· cited 27×
- State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-04-28· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 25×
- Bennett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-08· cited 22×
- State v. LefevreCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-21· cited 21×
- Shepler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-11-20· cited 20×
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-07-24· cited 13×
- State v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-03-27· cited 12×
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-10-08· cited 11×
- Loder v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2000-12-13· cited 10×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 679×
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 145×
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-04· cited 136×
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 57×
- Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesFifth Circuit· 1991-02-06· cited 49×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-12-10· cited 32×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-13· cited 28×
- Berenter v. GallingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-22· cited 27×
- People v. GassmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-10-22· cited 25×
- Cacavas v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-19· cited 24×
- Dano v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-01-15· cited 21×
- Knapp v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-06-14· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.