Skip to main content

State v. Phillips

Citations

  • 873 P.2d 706
  • 178 Ariz. 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Arizona’s DUI laws were “designed to protect the public by reducing the terrible toll of life and limb on our roads”
  • noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from ... drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
  • noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from ... drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
  • noting that, unlike the case with alcohol impairment, “there is no useful indicator of impairment from . . . drugs because they are fundamentally different from alcohol”
  • explaining that drugs’ potency cannot be accurately predicted
  • explaining that drags’ potency cannot be accurately predicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Grant, Voss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.