State v. Comried

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “any amount” of a controlled substance “means any amount greater than zero”
• rejecting the defendant’s argument that a regulation “setting cutoff levels for initial screening tests for drugs in urine samples” modified the definition of “any” in Iowa Code section 321J.2(1)(c
• affirming conviction for vehicular homicide based on trace amount of methamphetamine in defendant’s blood
• affirming conviction for vehicular homicide based on trace amount of methamphetamine in defendant’s blood
• “We conclude that the statute in question is clear and unambiguous and that ‘any amount’ means any amount greater than zero.”
• “[T]he statute . . . is clear and unambiguous . . . ‘any amount’ means any amount greater than zero.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).