· 2/4/1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 641 P.2d 1275
- 131 Ariz. 431
- 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accepting special action jurisdiction “because it appears from the pleadings that there are numerous litigants who are uncertain as to the law, and that a decision of this court is necessary to settle the matter and prevent further and unnecessary litigation”
- party challenging constitutionality has burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that legislation is infirm
- party challenging constitutionality has burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that legislation is infirm
- “Under the doctrine of separation of powers, the judiciary has the exclusive power to declare ‘existing law.’ ”
- courts “will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the act is in conflict with the federal or state constitutions”
- court must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, conflict of statute with constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.