Skip to main content
· 2/4/1982

Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 641 P.2d 1275
  • 131 Ariz. 431
  • 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting special action jurisdiction “because it appears from the pleadings that there are numerous litigants who are uncertain as to the law, and that a decision of this court is necessary to settle the matter and prevent further and unnecessary litigation”
  • party challenging constitutionality has burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that legislation is infirm
  • party challenging constitutionality has burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that legislation is infirm
  • “Under the doctrine of separation of powers, the judiciary has the exclusive power to declare ‘existing law.’ ”
  • courts “will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the act is in conflict with the federal or state constitutions”
  • court must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, conflict of statute with constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.