Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/28/1998
State v. Hammonds
Citations
- 968 P.2d 601
- 192 Ariz. 528
- 268 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
- 1998 Ariz. App. LEXIS 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that blood tests are “generally considered more reliable than the other tests”
- noting, in dicta, statutory predecessor to 28-1381(D) “is an affirmative defense to a charge of driving with a drug or metabolite in the body.”
- denying an equal protection challenge to a conviction based on a non-impairing metabolite
- legislature not required to for ego measure “ simply because it may be somewhat imprecise”
- flat ban on driving with a controlled substance in the body upheld
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sult, Gerber, Toci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 64×
- State v. ComriedSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-03-18· cited 36×
- State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-09· cited 27×
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 25×
- Bennett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-08· cited 22×
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-27· cited 17×
- Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.D. Arizona· 2019-02-07· cited 16×
- City of Tucson v. GrezaffiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-05-15· cited 14×
- Wozniak v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-09· cited 8×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-25· cited 8×
- State v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-12-14· cited 5×
- State of Arizona v. Angelica Marlene WerdermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-05-29· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-02-12· cited 5×
- State v. PanosCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-12· cited 4×
- Parker v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-26· cited 3×
- Empress Adult Video v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-27
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-08-07
- Vangilder v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-01-16
- Loncar v. DuceyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-22
- Doty-Perez v. Doty-PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-31
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 3,439×
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 398×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-12· cited 42×
- Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-11· cited 26×
- Lerma v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-07-16· cited 21×
- In Re LaraNinth Circuit· 1984-05-01· cited 13×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-02-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.